ArchitecturePlatformAI

Principal Solutions Architect.

I design cloud platforms that hold up under real traffic and real deadlines — turning tangled legacy systems into architecture that engineering teams actually enjoy shipping on.

Clouds
AWS + Google Cloud
AI systems
Claude Certified
Based in
Dallas, TX
Illustrated portrait of Suh Fangmbeng
Suh FangmbengDallas / Remote
  • AWS
  • Kubernetes
  • Terraform
  • Claude
  • Kafka
  • PostgreSQL
  • Google Cloud
  • Snowflake
  • Go
  • OpenTelemetry

01Services

How I help engineering teams

Whether you are exiting a data center, untangling a monolith, or trying to make deploys boring again — this is the work I get called in for.

  • 01

    Cloud architecture

    Reference architectures, landing zones, and migration roadmaps for AWS and Google Cloud that survive audit and scale.

  • 02

    Legacy modernization

    Breaking monoliths into services your teams can own, with a sequencing plan that keeps the business running.

  • 03

    Platform engineering

    Internal developer platforms, CI/CD pipelines, and IaC standards that make the safe path the fast path.

  • 04

    Data & integration

    Event-driven pipelines, API strategy, and data models that keep systems in sync without nightly batch jobs.

  • 05

    AI & LLM systems

    Agent architectures, retrieval pipelines, and eval harnesses designed by a Claude Certified Architect — not a demo that breaks in production.

  • 06

    Security & resilience

    Zero-trust patterns, IAM design, and DR planning reviewed against real failure modes, not a checklist.

Something else?

If it touches the platform, start a conversation.

Architecture reviews, team enablement, vendor evaluations — scoped to what you actually need.

Get in touch
Illustration of Suh Fangmbeng sketching a cloud architecture diagram
Whiteboard first, slides never

02About

Who's behind the work.

I'm Suh — a Cameroonian-born architect based in Dallas. I spend my days in whiteboard sessions with engineering leaders, translating messy business constraints into systems that scale, stay secure, and don't page anyone at 3am.

  1. 01

    Cloud and platform architecture

    From hands-on engineering to leading architecture for regulated, high-traffic workloads on AWS and Google Cloud.

  2. 02

    Migrations and platform builds

    Data center exits, monolith decompositions, and internal platforms that cut deploy times from weeks to minutes.

  3. 03

    Professional tier on both major clouds

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional and Google Cloud Professional Cloud Architect, so a multi-cloud or migration decision gets weighed on both sides rather than defended from one. Plus Claude Certified Architect — Professional for production LLM systems: agent orchestration, retrieval, evals, and the guardrails that keep them shippable. Verify the Claude credential

  4. 04

    Mentor first, architect second

    The best design is the one the team can own after I leave the room, so I document, teach, and hand it over.

See my full background

03Approach

The two problems I get called in to solve

Most of my work is a variation on one of these. Details change with the domain; the shape rarely does.

01Legacy modernization

Where I usually get called

The system nobody wants to touch

Every change ships with a held breath. The people who designed it have moved on, the test suite is decorative, and the business has stopped asking for features it assumes are impossible. I map what actually runs, find the seam that carries the least risk, and get one slice moved end to end so the team can see the pattern before committing to the rest.

02Platform engineering

The other half of the work

Ten teams, ten different answers

Everyone is solving deploys, secrets, and observability on their own, slightly differently, and the drift compounds. The fix is rarely a new tool — it is deciding which choices stop being choices. I define the paved path, make the right thing the easy thing, and leave a platform whose owners can change it without me.

04Method

How an engagement actually runs

Four phases, in order, every time. The deliverable is never a slide deck — it is a system your team can operate and a set of decisions they can defend.

  1. Phase 01

    Map what actually runs

    Not the diagram on the wiki — the real call paths, the cron job on someone's laptop, the table two services both write to. Nothing gets designed until the current state is honest.

  2. Phase 02

    Design for the constraint

    Compliance, team size, and the migration budget shape the answer more than any reference architecture does. I write the decision down, including what we deliberately chose not to do.

  3. Phase 03

    De-risk with a thin slice

    One real workload moved end to end, in production, before the big commitment. It either proves the pattern or exposes what the whiteboard missed — both are cheaper to learn now.

  4. Phase 04

    Hand off the keys

    Runbooks, decision records, and a team that can change the design without calling me. An architecture only one person understands is a liability, not an asset.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional

    Amazon Web Services

  • Google Cloud Professional Cloud Architect

    Google Cloud

  • Claude Certified Architect — Professional

    Anthropic · Verify on Credly

05Commitments

What you can hold me to

The measure of a good architect is what the team can do six months after the engagement ends.

I will tell you when the boring option is the right one. I will write down why we chose it, including the trade-off we accepted, so the next person does not have to guess. And I will not leave you with a design that only works while I am still in the room.
Suh Fangmbeng
Principal Solutions Architect · Dallas, Texas

06Writing

What I will argue about over coffee

The positions I keep coming back to in reviews, talks, and long Slack threads.

PracticeIllustration of architecture decision records pinned to a board

An undocumented decision is a decision the next team gets to make again

Decision records are not paperwork. They are the difference between a system with a rationale and a system with archaeology — and they take fifteen minutes.

ArchitectureIllustration of a monolith splitting into services

Stop splitting the monolith along the org chart

Data ownership should decide your first seam. Team boundaries move every reorg; the schema does not.

FinOpsIllustration of cloud cost decreasing on a chart

The cloud bill is an architecture review in disguise

Egress charges and idle capacity are not procurement problems. They are design decisions with an invoice attached.